TABLE STANDINGS
USL Championship| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | PTS | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 21 | 8 | +13 | 28 | 2.23 |
| 1 | San Antonio | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 16 | +2 | 21 | 2.62 |
| 2 | Detroit City | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 13 | +6 | 21 | 2.46 |
| 2 | Orange County SC | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 2.17 |
| 3 | Louisville City | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 21 | 3.29 |
| 3 | FC Tulsa | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 19 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Oakland Roots | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 18 | 2.77 |
| 4 | Charleston Battery | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 16 | +5 | 20 | 3.08 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 19 | 2.55 |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 17 | 2.38 |
| 6 | Indy Eleven | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 12 | +4 | 18 | 2.55 |
| 6 | Sacramento Republic | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 16 | 2.18 |
| 7 | Hartford Athletic | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 | 1.82 |
| 7 | El Paso Locomotive | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 23 | 22 | +1 | 16 | 3.75 |
| 8 | Lexington | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 15 | 2.67 |
| 8 | Miami FC | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 2.62 |
| 9 | New Mexico United | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 15 | 2.27 |
| 9 | Rhode Island | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 21 | 15 | +6 | 15 | 3.27 |
| 10 | Birmingham Legion | 12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 12 | 2.33 |
| 10 | Las Vegas Lights | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 15 | 3.17 |
| 11 | Brooklyn | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 9 | 2.92 |
| 11 | Colorado Springs | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 13 | 3.27 |
| 12 | Monterey Bay | 13 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 11 | 2.69 |
| 12 | Loudoun United | 11 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 9 | 3.09 |
| 13 | Sporting JAX | 13 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | 34 | -19 | 3 | 3.77 |
PAST MEETINGS
MATCH INTRO
This is the kind of fixture that tests whether the league table lies — and experience says it rarely does over ninety minutes. Pittsburgh Riverhounds sit near the top of the USL Championship for good reason, while Miami FC have found life at the other end of the table a grim experience. The quality gap is real, visible, and consistently reflected in the statistics. Our model does not hesitate: Home Win is the forecast, with an exceptionally high probability of 0%. An upset is possible, as it always is in football, but the data gives little encouragement to those who would bet on one.
LAST 6 MATCHES
PITTSBURGH RIVERHOUNDSLAST 6 MATCHES
MIAMI FCLAST 6 MATCHESTEAM PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W L W W W | 1.73 |
| Home | W W L W W | 2.40 |
| Away | W L D L W | 1.17 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 54.55% | 80.00% | 33.33% |
| AVG | 2.55 | 2.40 | 2.67 |
| Scored | 1.36 | 1.60 | 1.17 |
| Conceded | 1.18 | 0.80 | 1.50 |
| BTTS | 45.45% | 40.00% | 50.00% |
| CS | 27.27% | 40.00% | 16.67% |
| FTS | 27.27% | 20.00% | 33.33% |

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D W L W L | 1.43 |
| Home | D W W | 2.33 |
| Away | L W L L | 0.75 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 42.86% | 66.67% | 25.00% |
| AVG | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Scored | 1.86 | 2.33 | 1.50 |
| Conceded | 2.14 | 1.67 | 2.50 |
| BTTS | 71.43% | 66.67% | 75.00% |
| CS | 14.29% | 33.33% | 0.00% |
| FTS | 28.57% | 33.33% | 25.00% |
FORM EDGE ANALYSIS — WHO WILL WIN?


FIRST HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FCSECOND HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FCOVER / UNDER GOAL PROBABILITY
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FCBOTH TEAMS TO SCORE — BTTS TRACKER
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FCTRENDS


âš¡ MATCH TEMPO RADAR
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FC





















