TABLE STANDINGS
USL Championship| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | PTS | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 18 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 38 | 2.89 |
| 1 | Orange County SC | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 29 | 19 | +10 | 34 | 2.67 |
| 2 | Charleston Battery | 18 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 24 | +13 | 30 | 3.39 |
| 2 | San Antonio | 18 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 25 | 20 | +5 | 31 | 2.50 |
| 3 | Detroit City | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 25 | 17 | +8 | 28 | 2.47 |
| 3 | FC Tulsa | 17 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 29 | 2.12 |
| 4 | New Mexico United | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 15 | +5 | 27 | 2.33 |
| 4 | Louisville City | 18 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 32 | 31 | +1 | 27 | 3.50 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 18 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 26 | 2.22 |
| 5 | Sacramento Republic | 17 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 26 | 2.35 |
| 6 | Miami FC | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 24 | 31 | -7 | 22 | 2.89 |
| 6 | Lexington | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 22 | +5 | 25 | 2.88 |
| 7 | Rhode Island | 16 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 25 | 19 | +6 | 22 | 2.75 |
| 7 | Colorado Springs | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 28 | 24 | +4 | 25 | 3.06 |
| 8 | El Paso Locomotive | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 28 | 27 | +1 | 25 | 3.06 |
| 8 | Indy Eleven | 16 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 21 | 2.44 |
| 9 | Las Vegas Lights | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 25 | 27 | -2 | 23 | 2.89 |
| 9 | Hartford Athletic | 17 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 20 | 1.65 |
| 10 | Loudoun United | 17 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 21 | 29 | -8 | 18 | 2.94 |
| 10 | Oakland Roots | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 25 | 28 | -3 | 22 | 2.79 |
| 11 | Birmingham Legion | 17 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 17 | 2.29 |
| 11 | Phoenix Rising | 18 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 24 | 25 | -1 | 22 | 2.72 |
| 12 | Monterey Bay | 19 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 19 | 31 | -12 | 15 | 2.63 |
| 12 | Brooklyn | 17 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 17 | 32 | -15 | 13 | 2.88 |
| 13 | Sporting JAX | 19 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 23 | 51 | -28 | 8 | 3.89 |
PAST MEETINGS
MATCH INTRO
Every point matters when you are in a title race, and that fact does not diminish the quality of football on show โ if anything, it elevates it. San Antonio know that dropping points at the stadium could have consequences that reverberate for weeks. The pressure is real, and both sets of players know exactly what is at stake. When the stakes are highest, the better-organised team tends to prevail, and our model โ taking form, motivation, and historical patterns into account โ settles on a Home Win with a probability of 0%.
LAST 6 MATCHES
SAN ANTONIOLAST 6 MATCHES
FC TULSALAST 6 MATCHESTEAM PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W D L W W | 1.72 |
| Home | D W D L W | 2.00 |
| Away | D D L W W | 1.44 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 44.44% | 55.56% | 33.33% |
| AVG | 2.50 | 2.44 | 2.56 |
| Scored | 1.39 | 1.56 | 1.22 |
| Conceded | 1.11 | 0.89 | 1.33 |
| BTTS | 50.00% | 55.56% | 44.44% |
| CS | 38.89% | 44.44% | 33.33% |
| FTS | 33.33% | 22.22% | 44.44% |

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L W D W W | 1.81 |
| Home | W L W D W | 1.80 |
| Away | W W D L W | 1.83 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50.00% | 50.00% | 50.00% |
| AVG | 2.12 | 1.70 | 2.83 |
| Scored | 1.25 | 1.10 | 1.50 |
| Conceded | 0.88 | 0.60 | 1.33 |
| BTTS | 43.75% | 30.00% | 66.67% |
| CS | 50.00% | 60.00% | 33.33% |
| FTS | 25.00% | 30.00% | 16.67% |
FORM EDGE ANALYSIS โ WHO WILL WIN?


FIRST HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
San Antonio
FC TulsaSECOND HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
San Antonio
FC TulsaOVER / UNDER GOAL PROBABILITY
San Antonio
FC TulsaBOTH TEAMS TO SCORE โ BTTS TRACKER
San Antonio
FC TulsaTRENDS


โก MATCH TEMPO RADAR
San Antonio
FC Tulsa





















