PREDICTION ENGINE ANALYSIS
SIGNAL BREAKDOWN
Premium Feature
Upgrade to GoalLogic Pro to see the exact signals, mathematical models, and market data powering this prediction.
Unlock Engine BreakdownTABLE STANDINGS
Super League| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | PTS | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chengdu Better City | 21 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 42 | 21 | +21 | 45 | 3.00 |
| 2 | Qingdao Youth Island | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 26 | 29 | -3 | 31 | 2.62 |
| 3 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 21 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 29 | 2.24 |
| 4 | Dalian Zhixing | 20 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 29 | 3.35 |
| 5 | Yunnan Yukun | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 28 | 3.95 |
| 6 | Shandong Luneng | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 37 | 36 | +1 | 27 | 3.48 |
| 7 | Beijing Guoan | 20 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 34 | 27 | +7 | 26 | 3.05 |
| 8 | Shenyang Urban | 20 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 28 | 32 | -4 | 24 | 3.00 |
| 9 | Hangzhou Greentown | 21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 24 | 3.19 |
| 10 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 21 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 30 | 37 | -7 | 23 | 3.19 |
| 11 | Henan Jianye | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 26 | 25 | +1 | 22 | 2.55 |
| 12 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 30 | 27 | +3 | 19 | 2.85 |
| 13 | Shanghai Shenhua | 20 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 34 | +3 | 19 | 3.55 |
| 14 | Tianjin Teda | 20 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 29 | 24 | +5 | 17 | 2.65 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 20 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 28 | 35 | -7 | 15 | 3.15 |
| 16 | Qingdao Jonoon | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 30 | 40 | -10 | 14 | 3.33 |
Top Scorers
Super League
Hangzhou GreentownTop Assists
Super League
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou GreentownHead to Head
HANGZHOU GREENTOWN3 Wins 43%
QINGDAO JONOON1 Wins 14% PAST MEETINGS
MATCH INTRO
Midweek football has a different texture to the weekend game โ legs are heavier, concentration lapses more readily, and the tactical plans laid in a Saturday debrief meeting are harder to execute when the muscle memory is still recovering. Both Hangzhou Greentown and Qingdao Jonoon have been in action recently, and squad rotation could affect the balance of this contest. Our model accounts for fatigue indicators and still arrives at a Home Win as the primary forecast, though at a slightly moderated probability of 51% given the contextual uncertainty.
LAST 6 MATCHES
HANGZHOU GREENTOWNLAST 6 MATCHES
QINGDAO JONOONLAST 6 MATCHESTEAM PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L W D W L | 1.31 |
| Home | D L W W W | 2.00 |
| Away | W L L D L | 0.88 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 38.46% | 60.00% | 25.00% |
| AVG | 3.54 | 3.60 | 3.50 |
| Scored | 1.69 | 2.20 | 1.38 |
| Conceded | 1.85 | 1.40 | 2.12 |
| BTTS | 76.92% | 80.00% | 75.00% |
| CS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| FTS | 23.08% | 20.00% | 25.00% |

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D L L L L | 1.00 |
| Home | W L W D L | 1.70 |
| Away | L L L L L | 0.36 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 28.57% | 50.00% | 9.09% |
| AVG | 3.33 | 3.00 | 3.64 |
| Scored | 1.43 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
| Conceded | 1.90 | 1.30 | 2.45 |
| BTTS | 66.67% | 60.00% | 72.73% |
| CS | 9.52% | 20.00% | 0.00% |
| FTS | 28.57% | 30.00% | 27.27% |
FORM EDGE ANALYSIS โ WHO WILL WIN?


FIRST HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Hangzhou Greentown
Qingdao JonoonSECOND HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Hangzhou Greentown
Qingdao JonoonOVER / UNDER GOAL PROBABILITY
Hangzhou Greentown
Qingdao JonoonBOTH TEAMS TO SCORE โ BTTS TRACKER
Hangzhou Greentown
Qingdao JonoonTRENDS


โก MATCH TEMPO RADAR
Hangzhou Greentown
Qingdao JonoonEach cell shows one possible corner score. Darker green cells are the most likely exact outcomes. Use this together with the model pick to judge the best corner target line.
| Home โ Away โ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.757% | 1.778% | 2.339% | 2.27% | 1.813% | 1.26% | 0.789% | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | 1.42% | 3.335% | 4.386% | 4.258% | 3.4% | 2.363% | 1.48% | 0.854% | - | - | - |
| 2 | 1.492% | 3.503% | 4.607% | 4.472% | 3.571% | 2.482% | 1.554% | 0.897% | - | - | - |
| 3 | 1.156% | 2.715% | 3.571% | 3.466% | 2.768% | 1.924% | 1.205% | 0.695% | - | - | - |
| 4 | 0.737% | 1.731% | 2.277% | 2.21% | 1.765% | 1.227% | 0.768% | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | - | 0.961% | 1.264% | 1.227% | 0.98% | 0.681% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | - | - | 0.632% | 0.614% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10+ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |













