PREDICTION ENGINE ANALYSIS
SIGNAL BREAKDOWN
Premium Feature
Upgrade to GoalLogic Pro to see the exact signals, mathematical models, and market data powering this prediction.
Unlock Engine BreakdownTABLE STANDINGS
Super League| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | PTS | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chengdu Better City | 21 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 42 | 21 | +21 | 45 | 3.00 |
| 2 | Qingdao Youth Island | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 26 | 29 | -3 | 31 | 2.62 |
| 3 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 21 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 29 | 2.24 |
| 4 | Dalian Zhixing | 20 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 29 | 3.35 |
| 5 | Yunnan Yukun | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 42 | 41 | +1 | 28 | 3.95 |
| 6 | Shandong Luneng | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 37 | 36 | +1 | 27 | 3.48 |
| 7 | Beijing Guoan | 20 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 34 | 27 | +7 | 26 | 3.05 |
| 8 | Shenyang Urban | 20 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 28 | 32 | -4 | 24 | 3.00 |
| 9 | Hangzhou Greentown | 21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 31 | 36 | -5 | 24 | 3.19 |
| 10 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 21 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 30 | 37 | -7 | 23 | 3.19 |
| 11 | Henan Jianye | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 26 | 25 | +1 | 22 | 2.55 |
| 12 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 30 | 27 | +3 | 19 | 2.85 |
| 13 | Shanghai Shenhua | 20 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 37 | 34 | +3 | 19 | 3.55 |
| 14 | Tianjin Teda | 20 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 29 | 24 | +5 | 17 | 2.65 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 20 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 28 | 35 | -7 | 15 | 3.15 |
| 16 | Qingdao Jonoon | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 30 | 40 | -10 | 14 | 3.33 |
Top Scorers
Super League
Tianjin TedaTop Assists
Super League
Tianjin TedaHead to Head
QINGDAO JONOON2 Wins 29%
TIANJIN TEDA4 Wins 57% PAST MEETINGS
MATCH INTRO
Not every football fixture is a showcase of excellence. When Qingdao Jonoon and Tianjin Teda square off at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium, what is on display is something rawer: two clubs scrapping for points with urgency born of necessity rather than ambition. Neither side has been able to find a consistent rhythm this season, and the data reflects that. Our model does its best with imperfect information and arrives at a Home Win as the most likely outcome, though the 38% probability reflects just how unpredictable both of these sides have been.
LAST 6 MATCHES
QINGDAO JONOONLAST 6 MATCHES
TIANJIN TEDALAST 6 MATCHESTEAM PERFORMANCE COMPARISON

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D L L L L | 1.00 |
| Home | W L W D L | 1.70 |
| Away | L L L L L | 0.36 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 28.57% | 50.00% | 9.09% |
| AVG | 3.33 | 3.00 | 3.64 |
| Scored | 1.43 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
| Conceded | 1.90 | 1.30 | 2.45 |
| BTTS | 66.67% | 60.00% | 72.73% |
| CS | 9.52% | 20.00% | 0.00% |
| FTS | 28.57% | 30.00% | 27.27% |

| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L W W W W | 1.50 |
| Home | L D L W W | 1.12 |
| Away | W L W W | 2.25 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 41.67% | 25.00% | 75.00% |
| AVG | 2.75 | 3.12 | 2.00 |
| Scored | 1.67 | 1.62 | 1.75 |
| Conceded | 1.08 | 1.50 | 0.25 |
| BTTS | 50.00% | 75.00% | 0.00% |
| CS | 41.67% | 25.00% | 75.00% |
| FTS | 16.67% | 12.50% | 25.00% |
FORM EDGE ANALYSIS โ WHO WILL WIN?


FIRST HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Qingdao Jonoon
Tianjin TedaSECOND HALF GOAL PROBABILITY
Qingdao Jonoon
Tianjin TedaOVER / UNDER GOAL PROBABILITY
SIGNAL BREAKDOWN (LINE 2.5)
Premium O/U Breakdown
Upgrade to GoalLogic Pro to see the exact Over/Under signals, model weights, market odds, form data, and goal-probability nudges powering this line 2.5 prediction.
Unlock O/U Breakdown
Qingdao Jonoon
Tianjin TedaBOTH TEAMS TO SCORE โ BTTS TRACKER
Qingdao Jonoon
Tianjin TedaTRENDS


โก MATCH TEMPO RADAR
Qingdao Jonoon
Tianjin TedaEach cell shows one possible corner score. Darker green cells are the most likely exact outcomes. Use this together with the model pick to judge the best corner target line.
| Home โ Away โ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | - | - | 0.544% | 0.581% | 0.51% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | - | 1.061% | 1.534% | 1.637% | 1.437% | 1.098% | 0.756% | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | 0.649% | 1.675% | 2.422% | 2.584% | 2.268% | 1.733% | 1.193% | 0.757% | - | - | - |
| 3 | 0.756% | 1.952% | 2.822% | 3.011% | 2.643% | 2.019% | 1.39% | 0.882% | 0.524% | - | - |
| 4 | 0.725% | 1.871% | 2.705% | 2.886% | 2.533% | 1.936% | 1.332% | 0.845% | 0.502% | - | - |
| 5 | 0.605% | 1.561% | 2.257% | 2.408% | 2.114% | 1.615% | 1.112% | 0.705% | - | - | - |
| 6 | - | 1.174% | 1.697% | 1.81% | 1.589% | 1.214% | 0.836% | 0.53% | - | - | - |
| 7 | - | 0.813% | 1.175% | 1.254% | 1.101% | 0.841% | 0.579% | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | - | 0.527% | 0.762% | 0.813% | 0.714% | 0.545% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10+ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |













